ABSTRACT
As scholars, hesitations and doubts are fundamental apparatuses for ceasing the recycling of our own situated knowledges and questioning the extent to which our discourses are not self-serving. Instead of continuing to project an aura of refusing to stretch back to witness more horizons, this chapter exposes our loci of enunciation for unravelling the types of contradictions, reconciliations and aspirations that are interlocked within our texts to speak about interculturality. Throughout this chapter, the authors are questioning without the burden of providing cogent answers. They also engage in self-critique to model a healthy approach for crystallizing the type of epistemic doubting that could further refine our intellectual labour about interculturality and other topics. This chapter features some questions that are meant to destabilize our reasonings to allow for some refreshing crevices. The authors hope to engage the readers in exercising similar acts of epistemic fragmentation and embracing our positionalities and potential inaccuracies in living interculturality and doing research.
