ABSTRACT
“Heritage interpretation,” a vital facet of heritage management, has been overlooked by many policymakers, often relegated to informing tourists. However, heritage's essence lies in its social construct, offering meaning to modern societies. Interpretation unveils this meaning, making it crucial for institutions and society. Historical traditions of site description date back to ancient Greece, and modern archaeology gave rise to scholarly heritage accounts. The birth of mass tourism prompted heritage presentation practices, but comprehensive interpretation emerged later. Freeman Tilden's approach sparked a proactive, personalised visitor experience, but sometimes neglected the community's voice. While early heritage conventions lacked interpretation focus, the 1980s heralded shifts towards community and living culture considerations. ICOMOS' “Ename Charter for the Interpretation of Cultural Heritage Sites” marked a milestone, fostering inclusive, context-rich policies. In the face of modernity and globalisation, heritage reflects diverse identities and necessitates healing, reconciliation, and respect for various histories. Effective interpretation not only informs but educates, aligning with humanistic values upheld by global heritage policies.
