ABSTRACT

Lipset's article "Democracy and Working-Class Authoritarianism" (1959), published more than four decades ago, still plays a major role i n the dis­ cussion on the relation between class and political values. 1 It introduces the distinction between the two types of political values discussed in Chapter 1: economic liberalism /conservatism and authoritarianism/lib­ ertarianism. According to Lipset, the working class is at the liberal end of the former ideological dichotomy. Its members advocate economic redis­ tribution by the state and thus reject a distribution based on the free mar­ ket. Regarding the latter, pertaining to tolerance of nonconformity, acceptance of unconventional lifestyles, and respect for individual liberty, working-class liberalism is out of the question: "Economic liberalism refers to the conventional issues concerning redistribution of income, sta­ tus, and power among the classes. The poorer everywhere are more liberal or leftist on such issues On the other hand, when liberalism is defined i n non-economic terms-so as to support, for example, civi l rights for political dissidents, civi l rights for ethnic and racial minorities, interna­ tionalist foreign policies, and liberal immigration legislation-the relation is reversed" (1959:485).