ABSTRACT
Despite its rich potential for providing insight, the use of direct observation is not common in political science. Reason for this is that many of the subjects that political scientists study are too large in scale to allow direct observation. Some researchers choose not to use direct observation, even when it is appropriate and possible, because they question its scientific validity. Many of the concerns related to subjectivity in reporting results can be overcome by proper execution of direct observation. Direct observation can take several forms. Obtrusive research occurs anytime the persons being studied are aware of being observed. In unobtrusive research, subjects are unaware of being observed and, therefore, are unlikely to alter their natural behaviors in response to the research itself. Direct observation may unlock attitudes and behaviors that are otherwise inaccessible. Direct observation is especially subject to this danger because, with this method, the observer is the primary instrument of measurement.
