ABSTRACT
This chapter shows critical controversy revolved around the construction of a construction. It claims advanced in argument involved recommendation sets for the doing of art. The chapter brings the discussion into focus by making peace with artistically relevant controversy from the explicit vantage point of the reasons question, which asked us to interpret in a suitable manner the process of justification in that controversy. For the occurrence of "the work of art itself" signalizes that the artistically relevant controversy has already done its work, and when the job is done is surely no occasion to begin arguing. The proper occasion for artistically relevant controversy is set by the intersection of critical tradition with the matrix of art and the matrix of society at the point of the presented object. Consider now the judgment which finds a proper occasion for artistically relevant controversy only when considering critical objects as "works of art".
