ABSTRACT
Some scholars in the philosophy of science argue for an Aristotelian approach to politics. Aristotelian concepts and tools help to illuminate the consequences of terrorism and state repression on democratic stability in the political community. The evaluation of whether or not state works for the common good and aims to help its citizens flourish are issues that move to the forefront of the discussion when legitimacy is replaced by a more Aristotelian notion. This Aristotelian concept of the purposes of the state provides explanatory power to understand the consequences of terrorism and state repression on democratic stability. Some scholars, political theorists and others have argued that the Aristotelian approach is inappropriate for incorporation into the contemporary study of politics. The Aristotelian approach provides a purpose- or end-based concept to understanding the consequences of terrorist and state violence. The Aristotelian approach, with its aim of achieving the highest good possible and its requirements of virtue, is inherently purpose or end oriented.
