ABSTRACT
This part conclusion presents some closing thoughts on the key concepts discussed in the preceding chapters. The part highlights how everyday resistance in the form of activities, social relations and identities, is always spatially organized and how everyday resistance is practiced in and through space as a central social dimension. It focuses on who is carrying out the actions of everyday resistance in relation to other actors involved in the practice of resistance. A creation of more communication between authors belonging to different disciplines and theoretical traditions is hard, especially when there are disagreements on the fundamentals of how to understand “everyday resistance” as a phenomenon. The part shows that queering is a key example of a concept and theoretical approach that is very close to resistance, and it therefore serves the interest to show how studies of everyday resistance can be enriched by applying a more transdisciplinary openness, translation and dialogue with related fields.
