ABSTRACT
Though variation very likely is not wholly blind: innovations in existing technique may well have been more likely than not to be improvements. Perhaps the most important of these works are Boyd, R. and P. Richerson 1985: Culture and the Evolutionary Process. Chicago: Chicago University Press; Boyd, R. and P. Richerson 1996: Why culture is common but cultural evolution is rare. Proceedings of the British Academy 88,7793; Henrich, ]. and R. Boyd 1998: The evolution of conformist transmission and the emergence of between-group differences. Evolution and Human Behavior 19(2), 215-242; Boyd, R. and P. Richerson 2000: Memes: universal acid or a better mouse trap? In R. Augner (ed.) Darwinizing Culture: The Status o[1V[emetics as a Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press; Richerson, P.]. and R. Boyd 2001: Built for speed, not for comfort. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 23, 423-463; Henrich,]. and R. Boyd 2002: On modelling cognition and culture: why cultural evolution does not require replication of representations. Culture and Cognition 2, 87-112; Henrich,]. and R. McElreath 2003: The evolution of cultural evolution. Evolutionary Anthropology 12, 123-135; Richerson, 1'., R.lloyd, et al. 2003: Cultural evolution of human co-operation. In P. Hammerstein (ed.) Genetic and Cultural Evolution oJCooperation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 373-404; Richerson, 1'.]. and R. lloyd 2005: Not By Genes Alone: How Culture Transformed Human Evolution. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; Gil-White, F. 2005: Common misunderstandings of memes (and genes): the promise and the limits of the genetic analogy to cultural transmission processes. In S. Hurley and N. Chatel' (eds) Perspectives on Imitation: From A1irror Neurons to 1V[emes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
