ABSTRACT
For decades, the Chinese Constiwtion has been thought to lie outside judicial purview, as its basic rights provisions have been more or less ignored. For that reason, many outside observers have assumed that constitutional development in China is at a standstill. Nonetheless, in recent years, a number of Chinese lawyers, academics, and activists-pushing j(1r a more active judicial role-have been challenging standard assumptions about the Chinese Constitution. Taking antidiscrimination litigation as a key example, this article describes tl1e impetus inside China j(n· constitutional development and delineates the state's response. While state actors often ignore constitutional claims publicly, they may still respond to the underlying substantive issues raised by would-be rej(mners. The author argues that, although such ejforts have had limited impact on the formal constitutional structure, nevertheless, they have had a positive effect on tl1e public's rigllts consciousness.
