Breadcrumbs Section. Click here to navigate to respective pages.
Chapter

Chapter
‘Security Detention, Terrorism and the Prevention Imperative’, Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, 40, pp. 463–505
DOI link for ‘Security Detention, Terrorism and the Prevention Imperative’, Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, 40, pp. 463–505
‘Security Detention, Terrorism and the Prevention Imperative’, Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, 40, pp. 463–505 book
‘Security Detention, Terrorism and the Prevention Imperative’, Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, 40, pp. 463–505
DOI link for ‘Security Detention, Terrorism and the Prevention Imperative’, Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, 40, pp. 463–505
‘Security Detention, Terrorism and the Prevention Imperative’, Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, 40, pp. 463–505 book
ABSTRACT
Since the events of September 11, 2001, the United States and many of its allies in the global campaign against terrorism have adopted a new dominant security imperative: prevention of terrorist attacks against their homelands and national interests. In succinct terms, the prevention impera tive posits that the U.S. will engage all elements of national power (legal, economic, diplomatic, financial, military, intelligence, and information) to neutralize the threat posed by al Qaeda and other non-state actors. Detention of suspected terrorists has become a main facet of this prevention strategy, and several legal mechanisms have been employed in this regard in the U.S.