ABSTRACT
In the previous two chapters, we have considered some arguments that point toward limitations found in monotheistic morality and Christian political philosophy. In general, the problem is that there are significant limitations of the traditional monotheistic, monocultural, and monistic claims about human rights that are grounded in divine command ethics. But monotheism is not the only problem that we must consider. We must also critically engage atheism, which often appears to be the mirror image of monotheism. I am sympathetic to many of the arguments of atheism. As argued in previous chapters, I do not agree with much of Christian monotheism. But secular cosmopolitanism ought to be inclusive enough to include both atheists and theists despite the sort of deep diversity outlined in the previous few chapters. This chapter further explores the depth of our diversity while arguing that atheism would benefit from a more moderate, pragmatic approach.
