ABSTRACT
The agonistic structure of the retort rests upon the comparison between Eurymachos, whose valor, defined by his association with the suitors, is but a false construct, and Odysseus, who sets the uncontested standard of excellence. The implicit father-son antagonism that has been going on since the beginning of the poem (and has been unequivocally attesting to Odysseus’ preeminence) is finally carried out by two men in person, albeit in a covert manner and with same results. Eurymachos’ perspective on failure-generated shame is further elaborated upon in his response to Penelope regarding the beggar’s right to try the bow. An integral part of the plot from beginning of the poem, inadequacy of the suitors is definitively confirmed by their inability to measure up to archery skills of the king whose throne they are trying to misappropriate. This inadequacy is inextricably intertwined with their deficiency of character, as they, steeped in arrogance, persist in their violation of the laws of hospitality.
