Breadcrumbs Section. Click here to navigate to respective pages.
Chapter

Chapter
ConvertingtheStone:TextandImagesin EarlyOttomanBosnia
DOI link for ConvertingtheStone:TextandImagesin EarlyOttomanBosnia
ConvertingtheStone:TextandImagesin EarlyOttomanBosnia book
ConvertingtheStone:TextandImagesin EarlyOttomanBosnia
DOI link for ConvertingtheStone:TextandImagesin EarlyOttomanBosnia
ConvertingtheStone:TextandImagesin EarlyOttomanBosnia book
ABSTRACT
The previous chapters situated various forms of Bosnian Muslims’ commemoration of the dead – ritual, official and non-official, public and private – into the expansive field of memory studies and questions around spatial representation of death. Rather than existing as an abstract faculty, an object, or an esoteric mental reality to be summoned when needed, memory of the dead is recognised for its attachment to complex modes of signification associated with material and immaterial culture alike. Among different forms of memory, memory of the dead is particularly intricate because it is poised between the emotive expressions of bereavement, loss and remembrance and the ethical quandary regarding the transformation of the subject/ person into the material object/remains with whom a personal and social relationship may continue. Furthermore, the dead who inhabit our space are assigned material and symbolic signification to help us reflect on continuity in the past, present and future. There is physical proximity between us and the dead, but also distance occasioned by new ontological configurations. Although the speaking, living subject is absent, materialised into remains and silenced by the burial act, s/he can be re-animated through cultural and political interactions. Private memories and public ritual acts, official and unofficial, play an important role in connecting visual markers of death and memory and activating the imaginative and narrative processes to make the relationship with the dead meaningful and unbroken in some situations, and dysfunctional and severed in others. Memorial markers can occasion contact, usher debates, generate conflict, lead to reinterpretation of history, and erase many dimensions of memory. In this sense, although memorial markers – gravesites, plaques, shrines, monuments – appear to be stable and impervious physical structures encouraging connection and remembrance, they also function as precarious and contentious arenas which are mapped
examine in depth as primary cultural sources in which the dead come closest to self-identification and self-affirmation.