Skip to main content
Taylor & Francis Group Logo
    Advanced Search

    Click here to search products using title name,author name and keywords.

    • Login
    • Hi, User  
      • Your Account
      • Logout
      Advanced Search

      Click here to search products using title name,author name and keywords.

      Breadcrumbs Section. Click here to navigate to respective pages.

      Chapter

      Liberal Engagement, c. 1792–1820: The Argument for Cooperation
      loading

      Chapter

      Liberal Engagement, c. 1792–1820: The Argument for Cooperation

      DOI link for Liberal Engagement, c. 1792–1820: The Argument for Cooperation

      Liberal Engagement, c. 1792–1820: The Argument for Cooperation book

      Liberal Engagement, c. 1792–1820: The Argument for Cooperation

      DOI link for Liberal Engagement, c. 1792–1820: The Argument for Cooperation

      Liberal Engagement, c. 1792–1820: The Argument for Cooperation book

      ByEmma Macleod
      BookBritish Visions of America, 1775-1820

      Click here to navigate to parent product.

      Edition 1st Edition
      First Published 2013
      Imprint Routledge
      Pages 26
      eBook ISBN 9781315653365
      Share
      Share

      ABSTRACT

      Liberal British commentators on America between 1792 and 1820 rejected the brew of resentment, contempt and fear that constituted the conservative British attitude towards the new United States of America. Instead, they applauded the new republic for successfully limiting the power of the executive in government and for demonstrating that such a state could ourish politically and prosper economically, and they suggested that it had a vital role to play internationally. ey were more critical of American society and intellectual achievements, though, and, unlike radical writers, they were unwilling to be persuaded by the American example that popular sovereignty was a phenomenon to be emulated in Britain or elsewhere in the world. ey needed the American example to sustain their own particular political mythology, and they believed that America’s role in the world was to take up the British mantle of spreading liberty throughout the globe, but they did not wish to see Britain follow the American model of widely representative government, which was a totem to liberty rather than a pattern to be followed.

      T&F logoTaylor & Francis Group logo
      • Policies
        • Privacy Policy
        • Terms & Conditions
        • Cookie Policy
        • Privacy Policy
        • Terms & Conditions
        • Cookie Policy
      • Journals
        • Taylor & Francis Online
        • CogentOA
        • Taylor & Francis Online
        • CogentOA
      • Corporate
        • Taylor & Francis Group
        • Taylor & Francis Group
        • Taylor & Francis Group
        • Taylor & Francis Group
      • Help & Contact
        • Students/Researchers
        • Librarians/Institutions
        • Students/Researchers
        • Librarians/Institutions
      • Connect with us

      Connect with us

      Registered in England & Wales No. 3099067
      5 Howick Place | London | SW1P 1WG © 2022 Informa UK Limited