ABSTRACT
I looked at her paper and, il was Lrue-the manuscripl was no good. She reall y DID need 10 starl again. But where w as she to begin? The rest of the review continued in the same vein as it began, tellin g the author in broad and unpleasant generaliti es that her work was a waste of time, but the reviewer did not provide any guidance for Ihi s inexperienced academjc to help her revise her paper to make it more acceptable and potentially publishable.
