ABSTRACT
Now that we have introduced some of the formal machinery that Goodman developed to approach philosophical problems, we are almost ready to understand his chief work. A Study of Qualities, which was fi rst published in revised form as The Structure of Appearance, is certainly the most diffi cult piece Goodman ever wrote. It is full of technical subtleties and philosophically relevant observations. To understand its signifi cance, however, we fi rst have to look back at the philosophical context in which it was developed. We have emphasized in the previous chapters that Goodman’s work is best understood as situated within a certain branch of analytic philosophy, departing from Frege’s conception of ideal-language philosophy. Goodman’s 1941 dissertation A Study of Qualities is in large part a thorough analysis and further elaboration of the work of Carnap, his most famous predecessor in this tradition. Therefore we shall fi rst characterize Carnap’s project in the Aufbau ([1928] 1961). Although Goodman’s work is usually classifi ed as being an anti-foundationalist version of Carnap’s project,1 Carnap and Goodman in fact agreed on many more issues than is usually recognized. In fact, the main characteristics2 of Carnap’s philosophy of the 1930s also characterize Goodman’s philosophy:
to their respective purposes (i.e. methodological and ontological pluralism);
● the view that what are often taken as “ultimate” metaphysical questions are pointless except when relativized to a system (i.e. metaphysical and ontological relativism).
