Skip to main content
Taylor & Francis Group Logo
    Advanced Search

    Click here to search products using title name,author name and keywords.

    • Login
    • Hi, User  
      • Your Account
      • Logout
      Advanced Search

      Click here to search products using title name,author name and keywords.

      Breadcrumbs Section. Click here to navigate to respective pages.

      Chapter

      Well-being and death
      loading

      Chapter

      Well-being and death

      DOI link for Well-being and death

      Well-being and death book

      Well-being and death

      DOI link for Well-being and death

      Well-being and death book

      ByGuy Fletcher
      BookThe Philosophy of Well-Being

      Click here to navigate to parent product.

      Edition 1st Edition
      First Published 2016
      Imprint Routledge
      Pages 14
      eBook ISBN 9781315745329
      Share
      Share

      ABSTRACT

      So far we have focused mostly on theories of what is good for us and then, in the previous chapter, we looked at the question of whether how well our lives go as a whole is determined simply by how well they go at each point. But I would be very surprised if you have not asked yourself the following question: Is death bad for me? After all, we are just as interested (perhaps more interested) in this question as in the question of whether pain is bad for us, or whether it is bad for us to have our desires frustrated. In this last chapter, I will turn to examining whether death is bad for us. I will spend the rest of this section on some preliminary issues. We will then (§2) look at reasons to think that death is a harm, or that it is not a harm. In §3 we will look more closely at what is meant by ‘death’ in the context of the question of death and harm and I will also introduce an analysis of harm. In the next sections (§4-5) we use these understandings of what can be meant by ‘death’, and of what harm is, to assess the objections to the claim that death is a harm. The tentative conclusion is that there are good objections to one interpretation of the harm thesis but that there is another interpretation of the harm thesis, one under which there is a plausible case that death is sometimes a harm.1

      T&F logoTaylor & Francis Group logo
      • Policies
        • Privacy Policy
        • Terms & Conditions
        • Cookie Policy
        • Privacy Policy
        • Terms & Conditions
        • Cookie Policy
      • Journals
        • Taylor & Francis Online
        • CogentOA
        • Taylor & Francis Online
        • CogentOA
      • Corporate
        • Taylor & Francis Group
        • Taylor & Francis Group
        • Taylor & Francis Group
        • Taylor & Francis Group
      • Help & Contact
        • Students/Researchers
        • Librarians/Institutions
        • Students/Researchers
        • Librarians/Institutions
      • Connect with us

      Connect with us

      Registered in England & Wales No. 3099067
      5 Howick Place | London | SW1P 1WG © 2022 Informa UK Limited