ABSTRACT

This study is concerned with examining the role of al-ʿaql as an independent source of Sharīʿa (al-­dalīl­ al-ʿaqlī) as listed alongside the Qur’ān, the Sunna and specific juristic consensus (al-­Ijmāʿ). To identify exactly what is meant by al-­dalīl­al-ʿaqlī, in the sense of reason as one of the four sources of or indicators to Sharīʿa, it is important to first note that reason and rationality have a remit within uṣūl­al-­fiqh that goes beyond its theoretical inclusion as an independent source of Sharīʿa precepts. Uṣūl­ al-­fiqh itself may be considered a rational (ʿaqlī) discipline. It is a system developed through a form of philosophical analysis applied to socio-linguistic principles (al-­uṣūl­al-­lafḍiyya) and rational norms (banā’­al-ʿuqalā) in order to determine general rules for the interpretation of what may largely be reduced to the apparent meaning of texts (ẓuhūr­al-­alfāḍ) and rational correlations (mulāzamāt­­͑aqliyya). Not only is the method of analysis in uṣūl­ al-­fiqh based upon rational/nontextual argumentation and analysis, but also the method that it accords for the inference of Sharīʿa precepts, theoretically at least, is firmly entrenched within a framework shaped by a continued adherence to the Muslim interpretation of Aristotelian logic. The theory of uṣūl­al-­fiqh, both in the manner in which it is developed and applied, has come to operate within a methodological framework that privileges syllogistic forms of reasoning that aim to ensure certainty in one’s reasoning process. The extent to which this is actually achieved is open to question – a question whose further examination would be tangential to the main concern here, for this study is concerned with the role of al-ʿaql not as a method or source of analysis, but as an indicator to, or a source of, Sharīʿa precepts themselves. In arguably the most extensive analysis of al-ʿaql found in any of the textbooks of uṣūl­al-­fiqh currently taught in the Shī‘ī seminaries, Muḥammad Riḍā Muẓaffar defines al-­dalīl­al-ʿaqlī when considered ‘in contrast to the Book and the Sunna’ as:

every judgement of al-ʿaql that necessitates certainty in Sharīʿa precepts. In a second formulation, it is every rational proposition through which certain knowledge of Sharīʿa precepts are attained.1