Skip to main content
Taylor & Francis Group Logo
    Advanced Search

    Click here to search products using title name,author name and keywords.

    • Login
    • Hi, User  
      • Your Account
      • Logout
      Advanced Search

      Click here to search products using title name,author name and keywords.

      Breadcrumbs Section. Click here to navigate to respective pages.

      Chapter

      The background: events leading up to the introduction of ‘schizophrenia’
      loading

      Chapter

      The background: events leading up to the introduction of ‘schizophrenia’

      DOI link for The background: events leading up to the introduction of ‘schizophrenia’

      The background: events leading up to the introduction of ‘schizophrenia’ book

      The background: events leading up to the introduction of ‘schizophrenia’

      DOI link for The background: events leading up to the introduction of ‘schizophrenia’

      The background: events leading up to the introduction of ‘schizophrenia’ book

      ByMary Boyle
      BookSchizophrenia

      Click here to navigate to parent product.

      Edition 2nd Edition
      First Published 2002
      Imprint Routledge
      Pages 28
      eBook ISBN 9781315812205
      Share
      Share

      ABSTRACT

      The question which this chapter focuses on can be put like this: what made it seem reasonable to introduce the concept of dementia praecox/schizophrenia as a specific mental disease around the end of the nineteenth century? Or, to put it another way, how was it possible for the concept of schizophrenia to emerge, and to be accepted, at that time? Within a traditional account of schizophrenia as a scientific concept, albeit an imperfect one, these questions are rather perplexing. Schizophrenia, surely, was introduced and accepted because it was a reasonable (if imperfect) way of thinking about bizarre behaviour. It emerged because Kraepelin ‘discovered’ it; it emerged as the result of a gradual process of more scientific, enlightened and humane treatment of the ‘mentally ill’ (cf. Jones, 1972). In this framework, the historical background to the introduction of ‘schizophrenia’, while interesting in itself, is not seen as central to the current study and alleviation of ‘mental illness’. But if we see the concept or idea of schizophrenia as a problem in the present, then it is not simply that conventional answers to questions about its emergence are problematic; we need also to pose different questions which may make little sense within the traditional account.

      T&F logoTaylor & Francis Group logo
      • Policies
        • Privacy Policy
        • Terms & Conditions
        • Cookie Policy
        • Privacy Policy
        • Terms & Conditions
        • Cookie Policy
      • Journals
        • Taylor & Francis Online
        • CogentOA
        • Taylor & Francis Online
        • CogentOA
      • Corporate
        • Taylor & Francis Group
        • Taylor & Francis Group
        • Taylor & Francis Group
        • Taylor & Francis Group
      • Help & Contact
        • Students/Researchers
        • Librarians/Institutions
        • Students/Researchers
        • Librarians/Institutions
      • Connect with us

      Connect with us

      Registered in England & Wales No. 3099067
      5 Howick Place | London | SW1P 1WG © 2022 Informa UK Limited