Skip to main content
Taylor & Francis Group Logo
    Advanced Search

    Click here to search products using title name,author name and keywords.

    • Login
    • Hi, User  
      • Your Account
      • Logout
      Advanced Search

      Click here to search products using title name,author name and keywords.

      Breadcrumbs Section. Click here to navigate to respective pages.

      Chapter

      The official correspondence rules for inferring schizophrenia: 2 DSM-III, IIIR and IV
      loading

      Chapter

      The official correspondence rules for inferring schizophrenia: 2 DSM-III, IIIR and IV

      DOI link for The official correspondence rules for inferring schizophrenia: 2 DSM-III, IIIR and IV

      The official correspondence rules for inferring schizophrenia: 2 DSM-III, IIIR and IV book

      The official correspondence rules for inferring schizophrenia: 2 DSM-III, IIIR and IV

      DOI link for The official correspondence rules for inferring schizophrenia: 2 DSM-III, IIIR and IV

      The official correspondence rules for inferring schizophrenia: 2 DSM-III, IIIR and IV book

      ByMary Boyle
      BookSchizophrenia

      Click here to navigate to parent product.

      Edition 2nd Edition
      First Published 2002
      Imprint Routledge
      Pages 53
      eBook ISBN 9781315812205
      Share
      Share

      ABSTRACT

      This chapter is concerned with the ‘official’ rules for inferring schizophrenia, as set out in the 3rd and 4th editions of the DSM. Although it is DSM-IV which is currently in use, I shall also examine DSM-III in some detail.1 There are several reasons for this. First, as I noted at the end of the previous chapter, DSM-III was the landmark edition of the DSM, the first to include correspondence rules (diagnostic criteria) for its concepts. Subsequent editions have not made fundamental changes to the actual criteria for inferring ‘schizophrenia’, although the justifications given for producing particular criteria have changed. It is therefore important to examine DSM-III to evaluate the process by which the initial criteria were produced. Second, although the process of producing diagnostic criteria is presented as one of continual progress, in practice it is one of trying to repair the shortcomings of previous versions of the DSM while avoiding a fundamental examination of the validity of its diagnostic concepts. It is therefore difficult to appreciate the approach to producing schizophrenia’s correspondence rules which was taken in DSM-IV, the reasons why it was taken and the problems encountered, without knowing something about the approach adopted in DSM-III and its problems. Finally, it is not unlikely that the approach or justificatory framework adopted by DSM-III will resurface at some future time when its problems have been obscured or forgotten, so that it might be as well to keep them in mind.

      T&F logoTaylor & Francis Group logo
      • Policies
        • Privacy Policy
        • Terms & Conditions
        • Cookie Policy
        • Privacy Policy
        • Terms & Conditions
        • Cookie Policy
      • Journals
        • Taylor & Francis Online
        • CogentOA
        • Taylor & Francis Online
        • CogentOA
      • Corporate
        • Taylor & Francis Group
        • Taylor & Francis Group
        • Taylor & Francis Group
        • Taylor & Francis Group
      • Help & Contact
        • Students/Researchers
        • Librarians/Institutions
        • Students/Researchers
        • Librarians/Institutions
      • Connect with us

      Connect with us

      Registered in England & Wales No. 3099067
      5 Howick Place | London | SW1P 1WG © 2022 Informa UK Limited