ABSTRACT

General Kaufmann s Correspondence with Shir A li.— By way o f an introduction to this chapter, I will give some account of the correspondence of Kaufmann with the Am ir. The opening letter of a series, which led to his overthrow, was dated April 1 1 , 1 8 70 and referred to the arrival at Tashkent of Abdur Rahman. In it Kaufmann wrote that he had answered his request to be admitted to that city by stating that “ the Emperor of Russia graciously affords hospitality to everybody . . . but that he must not in the least reckon on my interfer­ ence in his quarrel with you ” . He also stated that he was “ quite far from longing to meddle in the internal affairs o f Afghanistan ” . Shir Ali was disturbed and perplexed as to the motive of the Russian GovernorGeneral in writing to him. He forwarded the letter to the Viceroy who advised him to send a reply, thanking Kauf­ mann for his assurances. This he did, adding that he had consulted the Viceroy in the matter. On December 20, Kaufmann wrote again, reciprocating his friendly senti­ ments. These letters were, more or less, colourless but, two years later, Kaufmann wrote another letter referring to the boundaries of the state o f Bukhara, which caused a sensation at Kabul. The Amir forwarded it to the Viceroy and drew attention to the Russian desire to establish “ a regular and frequent correspondence with the Kabul Government ” , H e ended his letter with

98 HISTORY OF AFGHANISTAN

an appeal to the British to bestow more serious attention to the maintenance o f the boundaries of Afghanistan. Nevertheless, Kaufmann continued his correspondence while “ positive assurances ” were being given to the British Foreign Office that the “ Imperial Cabinet con­ tinues to consider Afghanistan as entirely beyond its sphere o f action ” . It is possible that the British Foreign Office, at this period, failed to realize that Russian Turkistan was administered by the practically inde­ pendent Russian W ar Office.