Breadcrumbs Section. Click here to navigate to respective pages.
Chapter
Chapter
a in ff teec ra tcm tio o n re srbey al ist dictions into glob ian ic se m l at r m ti ondg elling of ocean-atmosphere model to a new equilibrium (e.g., Figure 2.5). This give a direct forecast of o th seph th e e ri sce ci S rc ST anom precipitat u io la n ti o (e n . gma ., o ly Jdpiee ls re new t a to l. lciibrrciuul oc m ati eoannsm ta o te deilnu tu n r ti nldirtivreesacahg es lo b a al atmospheric 1994). output . toWd in ri dvesttrhee ss ofc ie ela ds are taken fro m (n e th airs ) meoqdueil imp A ro lt vheom ug ehn ts t h in estehedsekv il elloofppmreendtisc ti hnagvEeNrSeO su -l rteelda te idnw et h al. 1994). This is a n fo m rm o del again and so on (Ji SSTs, their greatest contribution has been in diag sep earrea te t he c om at pmoonsepnhtes re ofantdheoocfeacnouaprleedhamnodd le e d ll in agsn ev oesri , ngsotm he ecroeu se p a le rc d ocean-climate h has in a d tm ic o at sepdhetrhee sy psotteemn . t ia Hlofw or a cl timmoastpehm er o ic demltohdaetlhacsan th ebeadavasnttaatgee -o of-f th sey -s a te rmt . g lo TbhaelaCpapnle ic aatn io dnsZeobf ia kENESNOSOSSSTSTprperdeidcitc io ti nosns -h aev .g e ., b e th en e p el reem di ecn ti tns. g Al w te o rn rl a d ti w ve id ly e , it prm ec aiyp it j at au us itonbeatnodm atically u a stati o st tihcearlt in seZdi as the b hat f m ur btahbewre asis f si g ( nCia fi noerse ta tta is l t . ic cant prog 1a9l9f4o ) r . ecH ast ress requi orwseovfemr, a ize yield model (e.g., Barnett et al. 1993). of es the in it clsueseim on s thre Feorufsu ef r u th lerrev in ie f w or smoaf ti o se n a , stohneal re fo ad re ecras is t in d g ir : ecPtaeldmteoro oc f th etahnee mea ic an annunalac nnual d at y m cl oesp ( c i. yec ., lecionuptlhiengmboe dels. In heric fields inst tewaedenotchleusf io ul nla (1 n9d98A ) n . derson (1994), Davey (1996), and Carson sainnof their the cmeatlh ie e s ) oc heaas ni tcu rn aendd out be exceedingly difficult
DOI link for a in ff teec ra tcm tio o n re srbey al ist dictions into glob ian ic se m l at r m ti ondg elling of ocean-atmosphere model to a new equilibrium (e.g., Figure 2.5). This give a direct forecast of o th seph th e e ri sce ci S rc ST anom precipitat u io la n ti o (e n . gma ., o ly Jdpiee ls re new t a to l. lciibrrciuul oc m ati eoannsm ta o te deilnu tu n r ti nldirtivreesacahg es lo b a al atmospheric 1994). output . toWd in ri dvesttrhee ss ofc ie ela ds are taken fro m (n e th airs ) meoqdueil imp A ro lt vheom ug ehn ts t h in estehedsekv il elloofppmreendtisc ti hnagvEeNrSeO su -l rteelda te idnw et h al. 1994). This is a n fo m rm o del again and so on (Ji SSTs, their greatest contribution has been in diag sep earrea te t he c om at pmoonsepnhtes re ofantdheoocfeacnouaprleedhamnodd le e d ll in agsn ev oesri , ngsotm he ecroeu se p a le rc d ocean-climate h has in a d tm ic o at sepdhetrhee sy psotteemn . t ia Hlofw or a cl timmoastpehm er o ic demltohdaetlhacsan th ebeadavasnttaatgee -o of-f th sey -s a te rmt . g lo TbhaelaCpapnle ic aatn io dnsZeobf ia kENESNOSOSSSTSTprperdeidcitc io ti nosns -h aev .g e ., b e th en e p el reem di ecn ti tns. g Al w te o rn rl a d ti w ve id ly e , it prm ec aiyp it j at au us itonbeatnodm atically u a stati o st tihcearlt in seZdi as the b hat f m ur btahbewre asis f si g ( nCia fi noerse ta tta is l t . ic cant prog 1a9l9f4o ) r . ecH ast ress requi orwseovfemr, a ize yield model (e.g., Barnett et al. 1993). of es the in it clsueseim on s thre Feorufsu ef r u th lerrev in ie f w or smoaf ti o se n a , stohneal re fo ad re ecras is t in d g ir : ecPtaeldmteoro oc f th etahnee mea ic an annunalac nnual d at y m cl oesp ( c i. yec ., lecionuptlhiengmboe dels. In heric fields inst tewaedenotchleusf io ul nla (1 n9d98A ) n . derson (1994), Davey (1996), and Carson sainnof their the cmeatlh ie e s ) oc heaas ni tcu rn aendd out be exceedingly difficult
a in ff teec ra tcm tio o n re srbey al ist dictions into glob ian ic se m l at r m ti ondg elling of ocean-atmosphere model to a new equilibrium (e.g., Figure 2.5). This give a direct forecast of o th seph th e e ri sce ci S rc ST anom precipitat u io la n ti o (e n . gma ., o ly Jdpiee ls re new t a to l. lciibrrciuul oc m ati eoannsm ta o te deilnu tu n r ti nldirtivreesacahg es lo b a al atmospheric 1994). output . toWd in ri dvesttrhee ss ofc ie ela ds are taken fro m (n e th airs ) meoqdueil imp A ro lt vheom ug ehn ts t h in estehedsekv il elloofppmreendtisc ti hnagvEeNrSeO su -l rteelda te idnw et h al. 1994). This is a n fo m rm o del again and so on (Ji SSTs, their greatest contribution has been in diag sep earrea te t he c om at pmoonsepnhtes re ofantdheoocfeacnouaprleedhamnodd le e d ll in agsn ev oesri , ngsotm he ecroeu se p a le rc d ocean-climate h has in a d tm ic o at sepdhetrhee sy psotteemn . t ia Hlofw or a cl timmoastpehm er o ic demltohdaetlhacsan th ebeadavasnttaatgee -o of-f th sey -s a te rmt . g lo TbhaelaCpapnle ic aatn io dnsZeobf ia kENESNOSOSSSTSTprperdeidcitc io ti nosns -h aev .g e ., b e th en e p el reem di ecn ti tns. g Al w te o rn rl a d ti w ve id ly e , it prm ec aiyp it j at au us itonbeatnodm atically u a stati o st tihcearlt in seZdi as the b hat f m ur btahbewre asis f si g ( nCia fi noerse ta tta is l t . ic cant prog 1a9l9f4o ) r . ecH ast ress requi orwseovfemr, a ize yield model (e.g., Barnett et al. 1993). of es the in it clsueseim on s thre Feorufsu ef r u th lerrev in ie f w or smoaf ti o se n a , stohneal re fo ad re ecras is t in d g ir : ecPtaeldmteoro oc f th etahnee mea ic an annunalac nnual d at y m cl oesp ( c i. yec ., lecionuptlhiengmboe dels. In heric fields inst tewaedenotchleusf io ul nla (1 n9d98A ) n . derson (1994), Davey (1996), and Carson sainnof their the cmeatlh ie e s ) oc heaas ni tcu rn aendd out be exceedingly difficult
ABSTRACT