Skip to main content
Taylor & Francis Group Logo
    Advanced Search

    Click here to search products using title name,author name and keywords.

    • Login
    • Hi, User  
      • Your Account
      • Logout
      Advanced Search

      Click here to search products using title name,author name and keywords.

      Breadcrumbs Section. Click here to navigate to respective pages.

      Chapter

      Historians and Noble Class
      loading

      Chapter

      Historians and Noble Class

      DOI link for Historians and Noble Class

      Historians and Noble Class book

      Historians and Noble Class

      DOI link for Historians and Noble Class

      Historians and Noble Class book

      ByDavid Crouch
      BookThe Birth of Nobility

      Click here to navigate to parent product.

      Edition 1st Edition
      First Published 2005
      Imprint Routledge
      Pages 57
      eBook ISBN 9781315838908
      Share
      Share

      ABSTRACT

      The idea that there was a characteristic medieval social orderwhich included social class was established in British historiography well before the end of the nineteenth century, and it had nothing to do with Karl Marx. It was the legal tradition in English history which stands at the root of this perception of class. The key thinker was Sir Henry Maine (1822-1888). In his great work, Ancient Law (1861) Maine proposed the idea of a ‘social state’ which had an evolutionary line of progression out of the ‘primitive’. Social evolution was for him revealed by the way a society’s legal system developed. Once a society had evolved the idea of a contract, entered into by individuals, then a man’s status floated free of family and clan and (amongst other things) social classes might develop. He explored how this would happen in his later work on medieval manors (1869). If, as he believed, the idea of lordship was imposed in the middle ages on what he believed were originally ‘free’ villages, then this would naturally tend to create social levels. The inferior tenants would have to enter into a contract of dependency on the lord whom the king had imposed on them, who would be their social superior.1

      Maine’s work lies at the root of many of the basic questions of the developing discipline of sociology, and the historiography of the ideas of family and of class begin with him and his circle of correspondents (see also Chapter 4). Despite Engels’ churlish claim in 1884 that Maine had said nothing that the Communist Manifesto had not said in essence twelve

      T&F logoTaylor & Francis Group logo
      • Policies
        • Privacy Policy
        • Terms & Conditions
        • Cookie Policy
        • Privacy Policy
        • Terms & Conditions
        • Cookie Policy
      • Journals
        • Taylor & Francis Online
        • CogentOA
        • Taylor & Francis Online
        • CogentOA
      • Corporate
        • Taylor & Francis Group
        • Taylor & Francis Group
        • Taylor & Francis Group
        • Taylor & Francis Group
      • Help & Contact
        • Students/Researchers
        • Librarians/Institutions
        • Students/Researchers
        • Librarians/Institutions
      • Connect with us

      Connect with us

      Registered in England & Wales No. 3099067
      5 Howick Place | London | SW1P 1WG © 2022 Informa UK Limited