ABSTRACT
Deterrence theory assumes that a rational drinker knows that consuming more than three or four drinks within an hour prior to driving would place him at risk of driving impairment and arrest for drunk driving. J. L. Nichols points out that such treatment programs may not be effective among Driving Under the Influence (DUI) repeat offenders because they do not have to prove they have gained control of their drinking problem pursuant to license reinstatement. Interlocks may provide a safety net for pretrial release of felony DUI offenders, reduce jail populations, and also be used in conjunction with other control and treatment measures. Electronic monitoring of course may be used in conjunction with other deterrence measures. In conclusion, should the technological deterrence measures prove to be effective, they provide a quick fix at least in short run without undue concern about altering individuals’ attitudes, values and/or drinking habits.
