ABSTRACT

The N obel prize involves m ore than the bestowing of honors for meritorious contributions to scientific knowledge. It has becom e an institution with effects that ramify throughout the social system of science. Few leaders in the fields covered by the prizes have been al­ together free of N obel aspirations and even scientists in the ineligible fields have strong opinions about the prize. Laureates as well as scien­ tists who have been passed by have their own brands of am bivalence toward it. H ow well does the prize do the job o f selecting the prime scientific achievements? And, can we say whether, on balance, it is good for science? These are, o f course, generic questions that can be raised about any institutional arrangement, and the N obel prize, with all its luster, is obviously not exem pt from such appraisal.