ABSTRACT
A central debate in the domain of language acquisition is how children acquire the
meanings of words. Although numerous studies have addressed this question in the last
few decades, researchers have not yet reached any consensus. One important line of
disagreement is whether children can use contextual or structural knowledge from the
sentence to bootstrap their learning of the semantic contents of words. Proponents of the
syntactic bootstrapping hypothesis (e.g., Gleitman, 1990) argue that children can and do
make use of the structural information to learn word meaning, whereas advocates of the
semantic bootstrapping hypothesis (e.g., Pinker, 1994) are suspicious of such an approach
that relies on the child’s distributional analysis of the input.