Breadcrumbs Section. Click here to navigate to respective pages.
Chapter
![easy with the short case of George Mitchell, a little more tricky with the length of Van Gend en Loos, although a table format simplified matters. The Factortame cases also have non-bracketed numbering to assist with cross-references. But here, a paragraph precis would create a book and not be very helpful. Yet the markers are useful. Paragraph clusters can be considered dealing with particular issues. The approach taken to this series of cases will be to ask you to: • skim read: literally imagine that you have a pile of papers and are flicking them through your hands. But skim read a little more slowly than this! Do not stop to read in detail. Look out for: headings; courts, to find out the procedural history; dates, get a feel for the chronology of events; what are the issues in the case? The skim reading will be followed by more detailed readings involving casenoting. (2) First skim reading of Factortame cases The extracts from the two law cases are set out in Appendix 3; turn to them now and read through them. Be warned, however, that these are long cases; therefore, if you take one minute to read a page—which is quite fast—it would take 75 minutes to read it all. This puts the task into context. So make sure that you have enough time to do this task. The cases are also of invaluable assistance for the micro-analysis of legal method—how to break into a highly complex set of cases giving vast amounts of information running to hundreds of pages. The length of the report is daunting and the language and content of the text formidable. However, persistence will allow the refinement of your developing skills of organising, comparing, describing, classifying and identifying facts and legal rules. Do not proceed until you have skim read the cases and taken notes according to the above guidance: Note how long it takes you to do so. Read the cases with your deconstruction of the question to hand so that you can ensure that you are constantly reading with a view also to the question. Having looked at the cases and made notes answer the following questions: (1) Describe your immediate reactions to the texts, to the issues, to the things you understood and to the things that you did not understand (you may relate to Figure 9.3, below). (2) What you think the cases were about? easy with the short case of George Mitchell, a little more tricky with the length of Van Gend en Loos, although a table format simplified matters. The Factortame cases also have non-bracketed numbering to assist with cross-references. But here, a paragraph precis would create a book and not be very helpful. Yet the markers are useful. Paragraph clusters can be considered dealing with particular issues. The approach taken to this series of cases will be to ask you to: • skim read: literally imagine that you have a pile of papers and are flicking them through your hands. But skim read a little more slowly than this! Do not stop to read in detail. Look out for: headings; courts, to find out the procedural history; dates, get a feel for the chronology of events; what are the issues in the case? The skim reading will be followed by more detailed readings involving casenoting. (2) First skim reading of Factortame cases The extracts from the two law cases are set out in Appendix 3; turn to them now and read through them. Be warned, however, that these are long cases; therefore, if you take one minute to read a page—which is quite fast—it would take 75 minutes to read it all. This puts the task into context. So make sure that you have enough time to do this task. The cases are also of invaluable assistance for the micro-analysis of legal method—how to break into a highly complex set of cases giving vast amounts of information running to hundreds of pages. The length of the report is daunting and the language and content of the text formidable. However, persistence will allow the refinement of your developing skills of organising, comparing, describing, classifying and identifying facts and legal rules. Do not proceed until you have skim read the cases and taken notes according to the above guidance: Note how long it takes you to do so. Read the cases with your deconstruction of the question to hand so that you can ensure that you are constantly reading with a view also to the question. Having looked at the cases and made notes answer the following questions: (1) Describe your immediate reactions to the texts, to the issues, to the things you understood and to the things that you did not understand (you may relate to Figure 9.3, below). (2) What you think the cases were about?](https://images.tandf.co.uk/common/jackets/crclarge/978185941/9781859417836.jpg)
Chapter
easy with the short case of George Mitchell, a little more tricky with the length of Van Gend en Loos, although a table format simplified matters. The Factortame cases also have non-bracketed numbering to assist with cross-references. But here, a paragraph precis would create a book and not be very helpful. Yet the markers are useful. Paragraph clusters can be considered dealing with particular issues. The approach taken to this series of cases will be to ask you to: • skim read: literally imagine that you have a pile of papers and are flicking them through your hands. But skim read a little more slowly than this! Do not stop to read in detail. Look out for: headings; courts, to find out the procedural history; dates, get a feel for the chronology of events; what are the issues in the case? The skim reading will be followed by more detailed readings involving casenoting. (2) First skim reading of Factortame cases The extracts from the two law cases are set out in Appendix 3; turn to them now and read through them. Be warned, however, that these are long cases; therefore, if you take one minute to read a page—which is quite fast—it would take 75 minutes to read it all. This puts the task into context. So make sure that you have enough time to do this task. The cases are also of invaluable assistance for the micro-analysis of legal method—how to break into a highly complex set of cases giving vast amounts of information running to hundreds of pages. The length of the report is daunting and the language and content of the text formidable. However, persistence will allow the refinement of your developing skills of organising, comparing, describing, classifying and identifying facts and legal rules. Do not proceed until you have skim read the cases and taken notes according to the above guidance: Note how long it takes you to do so. Read the cases with your deconstruction of the question to hand so that you can ensure that you are constantly reading with a view also to the question. Having looked at the cases and made notes answer the following questions: (1) Describe your immediate reactions to the texts, to the issues, to the things you understood and to the things that you did not understand (you may relate to Figure 9.3, below). (2) What you think the cases were about?
DOI link for easy with the short case of George Mitchell, a little more tricky with the length of Van Gend en Loos, although a table format simplified matters. The Factortame cases also have non-bracketed numbering to assist with cross-references. But here, a paragraph precis would create a book and not be very helpful. Yet the markers are useful. Paragraph clusters can be considered dealing with particular issues. The approach taken to this series of cases will be to ask you to: • skim read: literally imagine that you have a pile of papers and are flicking them through your hands. But skim read a little more slowly than this! Do not stop to read in detail. Look out for: headings; courts, to find out the procedural history; dates, get a feel for the chronology of events; what are the issues in the case? The skim reading will be followed by more detailed readings involving casenoting. (2) First skim reading of Factortame cases The extracts from the two law cases are set out in Appendix 3; turn to them now and read through them. Be warned, however, that these are long cases; therefore, if you take one minute to read a page—which is quite fast—it would take 75 minutes to read it all. This puts the task into context. So make sure that you have enough time to do this task. The cases are also of invaluable assistance for the micro-analysis of legal method—how to break into a highly complex set of cases giving vast amounts of information running to hundreds of pages. The length of the report is daunting and the language and content of the text formidable. However, persistence will allow the refinement of your developing skills of organising, comparing, describing, classifying and identifying facts and legal rules. Do not proceed until you have skim read the cases and taken notes according to the above guidance: Note how long it takes you to do so. Read the cases with your deconstruction of the question to hand so that you can ensure that you are constantly reading with a view also to the question. Having looked at the cases and made notes answer the following questions: (1) Describe your immediate reactions to the texts, to the issues, to the things you understood and to the things that you did not understand (you may relate to Figure 9.3, below). (2) What you think the cases were about?
easy with the short case of George Mitchell, a little more tricky with the length of Van Gend en Loos, although a table format simplified matters. The Factortame cases also have non-bracketed numbering to assist with cross-references. But here, a paragraph precis would create a book and not be very helpful. Yet the markers are useful. Paragraph clusters can be considered dealing with particular issues. The approach taken to this series of cases will be to ask you to: • skim read: literally imagine that you have a pile of papers and are flicking them through your hands. But skim read a little more slowly than this! Do not stop to read in detail. Look out for: headings; courts, to find out the procedural history; dates, get a feel for the chronology of events; what are the issues in the case? The skim reading will be followed by more detailed readings involving casenoting. (2) First skim reading of Factortame cases The extracts from the two law cases are set out in Appendix 3; turn to them now and read through them. Be warned, however, that these are long cases; therefore, if you take one minute to read a page—which is quite fast—it would take 75 minutes to read it all. This puts the task into context. So make sure that you have enough time to do this task. The cases are also of invaluable assistance for the micro-analysis of legal method—how to break into a highly complex set of cases giving vast amounts of information running to hundreds of pages. The length of the report is daunting and the language and content of the text formidable. However, persistence will allow the refinement of your developing skills of organising, comparing, describing, classifying and identifying facts and legal rules. Do not proceed until you have skim read the cases and taken notes according to the above guidance: Note how long it takes you to do so. Read the cases with your deconstruction of the question to hand so that you can ensure that you are constantly reading with a view also to the question. Having looked at the cases and made notes answer the following questions: (1) Describe your immediate reactions to the texts, to the issues, to the things you understood and to the things that you did not understand (you may relate to Figure 9.3, below). (2) What you think the cases were about?
ABSTRACT