ABSTRACT
Recognizing as fundamental the legitimacy of subjective and free creativity in any Architecture of Rehabilitation, that is, as an operational reality that in the limit may have as many ways and purposes to do as its potential players, an attempt is made to justify an ‘undisciplined’ idea of this architectural field, a conception that implies that we speak not of Rehabilitation, but multiple rehabilitation. Thus, despite all the identity and mnemonic risks that arise in these areas due to the tacit omission of limits, risks which, however, we believe can be controlled by intelligent mediation, this reflection defends an open and plural vision of the so-called Rehabilitation because it will always have to be a free and creative act of Architecture, either because in the practical realizations of some Urban and/or Architectural Rehabilitation, to exist, nothing will really remain in them as before.
