ABSTRACT
This work aims to determine and describe the anti-oriented argumentative relationships that contribute to structuring dialogic discourse. The empirical material used is composed of digital conversational and interactional texts. Methodologically, the guidelines of Pragmatic Linguistics are followed. The study of this material highlights the existence of three non-exclusive anti-oriented argumentative relationships: dissidence, disqualification and counterargumentation. Furthermore, the counterargumentative relationship contains three subtypes: objection, concession, and recusal. Each of these relations uses different formal marks for its verbalization, including conjunctions, discourse markers or operators. On other occasions, the anti-orientation relationship is based on the introduction of an argument that has a topos of opposite orientation.
