ABSTRACT
This chapter examines the roles and challenges of cultural experts in legal contexts, particularly the interdisciplinary dynamics involved in formulating and addressing questions posed to cultural experts. Beginning with an overview of how interdisciplinary interactions shape the formulation of questions, the chapter explores the distinct epistemological frameworks of law and anthropology. Legal systems prioritise causality and clear-cut answers, whereas anthropology emphasises context and collective dynamics, potentially leading to misunderstandings in legal settings. The chapter discusses how cultural expertise can prevent such misunderstandings, clarify complex socio-cultural contexts, and mitigate stereotypes, particularly in asylum, family, and criminal cases. By examining cases in the UK, France, Belgium, and Australia, the chapter illustrates common points of misinterpretation, such as specific behaviours that may be perceived as deceptive or inconsistent. The chapter also addresses the importance of procedural neutrality, advocating for cultural experts to offer unbiased, context-driven knowledge that bridge cultural and legal perspectives. Concluding with practical considerations, the chapter calls for interdisciplinary awareness between legal and social science professionals, promoting a collaborative approach to accurate incorporation of cultural expertise into legal proceedings while upholding both scientific integrity and judicial standards.
