ABSTRACT
Although Latter-day Saints (LDSs) typically self-identify as Christian theists, the theism of their system is disputed. A.A. Howsepian goes so far as to accuse LDSs of atheism. In response, Blake Ostler laments the parochialism of Christian theism. So, in this chapter, Ashfield begins by offering a deliberately ecumenical and expansive explication of theism as Exclusive Agential Ultimacy (EAU), according to which theism is the proposition that the ultimate or fundamental level of reality is primarily ordered by few agential sources. Next, Ashfield applies EAU to illuminate the plausible nontheism of several popular LDS theological pictures, which closely resemble paradigmatically non-theistic positions, like Eric Steinhart’s ordinal polytheism, Pure Land Buddhism, and Jainism. However, contrary to Howsepian’s contention, LDS theology is not well understood as atheistic. So, Ashfield also considers the prospects for reformulating LDS theology theistically. He argues that in several respects, an LDS theism seems likely to bear greater resemblance to African Traditional Religion, Zoroastrianism, or Manichaeism, rather than the Abrahamic traditions of which it claims to be a restoration, though not in every important respect. Finally, Ashfield argues that while LDSs qua LDSs need not care whether they are theists, LDSs qua theologians and philosophers probably should.
