ABSTRACT
This chapter first examines the implications of the functional coexistence approach to conflict intervention and peacebuilding, aiming to build an action research framework for decades-long program evaluation. It views evaluation as a sustained, purposeful process of inclusive learning and continuous program improvement while also ensuring accountability for the program’s demonstrated impact on fostering conditions for long-term systemic change. The guideposts for an extended, discovery-oriented process in the functional coexistence approach suggest general guidelines for evaluation and learning. These guidelines include fostering a macro-historical view of enduring conflict and social change, finding a systemic and strategic perspective on the entrenchment and transformation of conflict, staying constructively engaged in the ongoing state of conflict non-resolution, and purposefully linking short-term projects to a long-term vision of change. The chapter then uses this evaluation framework to examine existing policymaking and funding practices that prioritize short-term project cycles and immediate, tangible results. To overcome their negative consequences, we propose initiating and expanding multi-sectoral discussions. In these discussions, funders and policymakers can learn about the need and merit of the functional coexistence approach to decades-long conflict engagement, its methods, supporting evidence, and best practices. They can also jointly explore practical ways to overcome institutional resistance to the required shift from short-term funding and policy programming cycles.
