ABSTRACT
This study aims to describe the meaning of metafunction contained in the text of Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2016 concerning Mediation and the metafunction relationship and social context contained in Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2016 concerning Mediation. The method used in this study is a qualitative method. Qualitative methods are used to answer the first and second problems. This research method is used to obtain data logically and empirically. The data obtained were then analyzed using the metalanguage theory pioneered by Halliday and Martin. The results of this study are that the meaning of metafunction contained in the text of Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2016 consists of three levels: ideational meaning, interpersonal meaning, and textual meaning. In a social context, by looking at the content, involvement, and method. The contents of the text of MA Regulation Number 1 of 2016 concerning mediation is the fulfillment of citizens’ rights to justice in obtaining justice and reconciliation in civil law disputes. This shows that civil law processes, especially disputes, can be passed peacefully, namely carrying out the mediation process as a way of the dispute process. This is contained in the first part of the consideration for the formation of the regulation to realize a peaceful dispute resolution method that is appropriate, effective, and can open wider access to the Parties to obtain a satisfactory and fair resolution.
