ABSTRACT
The interpretation of Galatians has been characterized by what might be called the hermeneutics of disruption: the term σάρξ was assumed to change meaning from verse to verse, and certain passages were treated as if more or less disconnected from the letter's overall objective and argumentation. In this chapter, the opening narrative is investigated as assuming the role of a narratio (see Quintilian)—that is, as indicating the fundamental aspects of the case that will be discussed—while also providing the interpretive keys to the correct understanding of its subsequent arguments. Simultaneously, a more collectively oriented interpretation of σάρξ is tested as comprising the semantic elements of collective group and collective identity. Importantly, Paul does not oppose the custom of male circumcision as such. Rather, he opposes its imposition on the Galatian assemblies. In the opening narrative, Paul describes how he stood up against Peter and, subsequently, he encourages his Galatian addressees to stand up against anyone who wants to intimidate them by exploiting their fear of exclusion should they not comply. Hence, the collectively oriented interpretation of σάρξ results in a reading of Galatians with a higher level of coherency between the letter's narrative introduction and its following argumentation.
