ABSTRACT
Chapter 8 formulates a motion for copyright lawyers to start working in a more interdisciplinary way, with an open ear to knowledge produced in other societal systems. Based on this proposal, the chapter goes on to show how it can be possible to conceptually reframe the interpictorial original copy and grasp its novelty even without seeing a formal difference from the original work it is based upon. It concludes by restating the difference between the interpictorial artwork and instances of forgery and plagiarism, individuating in the oscillating existence of the interpictorial original copy the characteristic that makes it different and worth protecting.
