ABSTRACT
This chapter explores Nepal’s historical evolution as a small state within the context of International Relations theory and philosophical concepts. The main purpose of this chapter is to provide different alternative discussions on small states. First, the chapter focuses on the relative idea of smallness based on geography. Further, this chapter draws into the discursive positioning of Nepal as a small state. It states that how an identity of state can be engrained into national consciousness by discourses and narratives. Notably, the discussion on the geo-psychological positioning of Nepal as a small state’s smallness of Nepal as an emotional outcome is deeply intertwined with the nation’s historical experiences and geopolitical realities. Drawing from Nietzsche’s critique of power and mimicry, the analysis examines how Nepal’s leaders strategically adapted to maintain autonomy, utilising mimicry to navigate relations with India and China. This historical exploration highlights Nepal’s resilience and strategic acumen in a complex geopolitical landscape, where the dynamics of smallness and power continue to shape its national identity and foreign policy decisions.
