ABSTRACT
We are close to our intended goal of making a reasonably complete and self-consistent proposal. We have one final question to tackle: can we really measure the non-market use of works precisely and reliably enough to set the basis for rewards? Strongly divergent opinions have been expressed on this topic in the past. Some managers of collecting societies, who were hostile to a flat-rate-based legalization of file sharing, initially claimed that it was impossible to measure usage, and that the system would be prone to an enormous amount of fraud. 1 Then, as such a system started looking increasingly likely to be implemented, others said that there was no problem at all, provided they were the ones to do it. 2 Finally, yet others declared that it was intrinsically unfair, since the methods would necessarily use statistics, while their present measures for other sources of revenues use detailed counting of every use. 3 This objection is ironic, since they measure only an extremely limited fraction of the use of works, compared to what we are trying to address.
