ABSTRACT
Only at one’s peril would one underestimate the extent and pace of change occurring in Ireland. Over the space of just six years in the 1990s, the country saw phenomenal growth in jobs, output and incomes as well as significant changes in consumption, lifestyles, values and patterns of political and social organisation. Indeed, it may not be unreasonable to claim that Ireland changed as much in the last decade as in the preceding century. Gainsaying many predictions and the experience of most other countries, ‘Ireland.plc’ prospered hugely as trade and markets became more globalised and supranational political and economic blocs more established. Ireland is generally regarded as a model case of how a small European country has benefited particularly from the current stage of the globalised competitive economy. The picture which this chapter paints of Ireland is somewhat different: an economy-oriented (and within that competition-oriented), carefully managed model of national modernisation which has self-consciously built a capital-friendly economic policy, a consensus-oriented political culture and a model of society in which the ‘social’ is subservient to the economic. This piece distances itself from much of the existing literature which is quite polarised in how it interprets and explains the Irish case. Growth tends to be attributed either to economic factors (international but also national) or to political factors. Here I argue for a more complicated analysis, claiming that the story of Ireland’s ‘success’ needs to be cast in terms of an interaction between policy, politics and economics. Furthermore, the attribution of ‘success’ to the Irish model in implying significant change may be premature. A more guarded interpretation is called for when one considers how recent Ireland’s growth and its sustainability are. Developments in the last few years not only indicate Ireland’s vulnerability to recession in the usa but also reveal endogenous challenges, in terms of the management of public finances and the likely continuation of policy consensus.
