Skip to main content
Taylor & Francis Group Logo
Advanced Search

Click here to search books using title name,author name and keywords.

  • Login
  • Hi, User  
    • Your Account
    • Logout
Advanced Search

Click here to search books using title name,author name and keywords.

Breadcrumbs Section. Click here to navigate to respective pages.

Chapter

The praxis of Multilevel Governance in the European Union. Two paradigmatic case studies and one conflict

Chapter

The praxis of Multilevel Governance in the European Union. Two paradigmatic case studies and one conflict

DOI link for The praxis of Multilevel Governance in the European Union. Two paradigmatic case studies and one conflict

The praxis of Multilevel Governance in the European Union. Two paradigmatic case studies and one conflict book

The praxis of Multilevel Governance in the European Union. Two paradigmatic case studies and one conflict

DOI link for The praxis of Multilevel Governance in the European Union. Two paradigmatic case studies and one conflict

The praxis of Multilevel Governance in the European Union. Two paradigmatic case studies and one conflict book

BySerafín Pazos-Vidal
BookSubsidiarity and EU Multilevel Governance

Click here to navigate to parent product.

Edition 1st Edition
First Published 2019
Imprint Routledge
Pages 24
eBook ISBN 9780429453373

ABSTRACT

This chapter provides the European Commission, and partly the European Parliament, to equate subnational authorities to private lobbyists in the European Union (EU) Transparency Register. Therefore, in terms of “Better Regulation”, it could have been more reasonable to propose, for instance, amending this international regime rather than creating a new regulatory layer at the EU level. Perhaps one of the best practical examples of a multilevel coalition being successfully assembled, in the pre-legislative stage, specifically to argue against an incoming EU policy on grounds of subsidiarity, came into being after the Commission attempted to legislate on urban mobility. Thus, it can be argued that the praxis of subsidiarity scrutiny is more heavily reliant on political and practical factors than on the relative merit of the subject matter itself. By contrast there are many other examples, such as the proposal for standardisation of public documents, even if the subject matter was directly concerned by subsidiarity.

T&F logoTaylor & Francis Group logo
  • Policies
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions
    • Cookie Policy
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions
    • Cookie Policy
  • Journals
    • Taylor & Francis Online
    • CogentOA
    • Taylor & Francis Online
    • CogentOA
  • Corporate
    • Taylor & Francis Group
    • Taylor & Francis Group
    • Taylor & Francis Group
    • Taylor & Francis Group
  • Help & Contact
    • Students/Researchers
    • Librarians/Institutions
    • Students/Researchers
    • Librarians/Institutions
  • Connect with us

Connect with us

Registered in England & Wales No. 3099067
5 Howick Place | London | SW1P 1WG © 2021 Informa UK Limited